3. What changes occur which lead to a
breakdown of “normal science” and the “revolutions” that Kuhn speaks of in his
title?
According to Kuhn, a scientific revolution occurs when “an
existing paradigm has ceased to function adequately in the exploration of an
aspect of nature to which that paradigm itself had previously led the way”
(92). The admittance of anomalies within the preexisting paradigm demands a reconsideration
of that paradigm against a new paradigm that does explain those anomalies.
These two paradigms necessarily oppose one another, with each paradigm saying
different things by different methods about whatever field of nature they
attempt to explain. Since distinct paradigms have their own set of puzzles and
foundational beliefs, the argumentation for each paradigm will be circular in
nature, what with a given paradigm arguing within its own boundaries. The
crises presented by anomalies, still, serve to usher in a new paradigm that
will more thoroughly explain nature and will offer up puzzles that can be used
to deepen that understanding further until anomalies within this new paradigm
demand another replacement.
No comments:
Post a Comment