2. Mill excludes ‘backward’ nations and children from his
prescription of rights. Why?
3. What would Mill think society’s attitude (and its laws)
should be about the Muslim extremist belief that the US is the agent of the
devil?
4. What value is there is letting people do what they want?
When should they be restrained?
5. Sometimes Mill talks about contemporary countries, and
particularly England, as more able to realize the ideals of liberty, and
sometimes he says they are less likely to do so. What is the source of his
pessimism?
Application 1: Apply the ‘harm principle’ (you can say
anything except what harms others) to the set of norms advocating the use of
‘recreational drugs’.
No comments:
Post a Comment